Yes, I’ve been busy, so busy in fact that I’ve not had time to “god blog” (and for those of you thinking “hey, I thought You had infinite capacity!”, my answer to you is “I do infinite capacity, I’m just making up an excuse - I do that sometimes”).
Now, on to the latest doomed attempt by the non-believers to logic Me out of existence. Barney87 posted the argument popularized by that pesky Richard “Prove it to me” Dawkins:
1) Complex entities can come into existence in three ways: either by design, evolution or chance.
2) God is a complex entity.
3) God cannot have been designed.
4) God cannot have evolved.
5) Therefore, God must have come into existence by chance.
6) The probability of a being spontaneously coming into existence with the remarkable properties of God (omnipotence, omniscience and omnibenevolence) is extremely slight.
7) Therefore, God’s existence is extremely improbable.
Improbable, Mr R Dawkins, but not impossible. That’s no winning argument - in fact it’s a blatant admission that I might exist. And I blog too, but just because it is seems highly improbable that I blog, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, yet here you are reading this post, written effortlessly (and without spellchecker turned on) by the Creator Myself.
So since Mr Dawkins is practically admitting I exist (I accept his apology), let’s state here a more graceful and infallible argument that proves My wonderful existence, quoted from the blaspheming John Allen Paulos’ new book “Irreligion“:
- Something - the diversity of lifeforms, the beauty of the outdoors, the stars, the fine structure constants - is much to complex (or too perfect) to have come about randomly or by sheer accident.
- This something must have been the handiwork of some creator (yours truly).
- Therefore God (er, Me), exists.
It doesn’t get much simpler or obviously correct than this. Matter settled…next!
Posted by fakegod
